Labeobarbus nzadinkisi

You can sponsor this page

Labeobarbus nzadinkisi Vreven, Musschoot, Decru, Wamuini Lunkayilakio, Obiero, Cerwenka & Schliewen, 2018

上传你的 图片 和 影像
谷歌图片
Image of Labeobarbus nzadinkisi
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cyprinidae.

分类 / 名称 俗名 | 同种异名 | Catalog of Fishes(, ) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

Teleostei > Cypriniformes (Carps) > Cyprinidae (Minnows or carps) > Torinae
Etymology: nzadinkisi: The current name of the Inkisi River is derived from its local appellation 'Nzadi I nkisi' in Kikongo (Kintandu/Kindibu dialects), referring to the missionaries who threw the 'mi-nkisi', fetish object containing a certain nkisi spirit, in the river in their effort to convert the local populations to Christianity; species name referring to this new name of the river basin to which it appears endemic; in addition, by its reference to the nkisi-objects, indirectly referring to the enigmatic hybridization complex of which this species is a parental species; a noun in apposition, making its gender ending unchangeable (Ref. 127934).

环境:氛围 / 气候带 / 深度上下限 / 分布范围 生态学

; 淡水 底中水层性.

分布 领土 | FAO区域 | 生态系 | 标本纪录 | 分布图 | 简介 | Faunafri

Africa: Inkisi River, Lower Congo River basin above the Zongo Falls, in Democratic Republic of the Congo (Ref. 127934).

大小 / 重量 / 年龄

成熟度: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 20.5 cm SL 雄鱼/尚未辨别雌雄; (Ref. 127934)

简单描述 检索表 | 型态特徵 | 形态测量图

背棘 (总数) : 0; 背的软条 (总数) : 14 - 16; 臀棘: 0; 臀鳍软条: 9; 脊椎骨: 37 - 38. Diagnosis: Within the Congo basin Labeobarbus nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. altipinnis, L. ansorgii, L. batesii, L. brauni, L. cardozoi, L. caudovittatus, L. dartevellei, L. fasolt, L. habereri, L. humphri, L. iphthimostoma, L. iturii, L. jubbi, L. longidorsalis, L. longifilis, L. lufupensis, L. macroceps, L. macrolepidotus, L. macrolepis, L. mawambi, L. mawambiensis, L. mirabilis, L. nanningsi, L. oxyrhynchus, L. paucisquamatus, L. stappersii, L. trachypterus, L. upembensis and L. wittei by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. leleupanus by its low number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 45-47; from L. tropidolepis and L. platyrhinus by its low number of scales between the lateral line and the dorsal and ventral midline, 4.5-5.5 and 5.5 vs. 7.5-8.5 and 7.5-9.5 in L. tropidolepis and 6.5-7.5 and 6.5-8.5 in L. platyrhinus, and from the latter by its low number of circumpeduncular scales as well, 12-14 vs. 16-18; from L. robertsi by the absence of papillae on the anterior edge of the lower jaw vs. with numerous well identifiable papillae; from L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. prognathous; from L. altianalis, L. gestetneri and L. somereni by its lack of both pairs of barbels vs. two pair of well-developed barbels; and from L. pellegrini by its short prepelvic length, 46.5-48.5% of standard length vs. 50.6%, its short pelvic length, 17.9-21.0% of standard length vs. 21.8%, and its large eye, 29.1-34.6% of head length vs. 27.1% (Ref. 127934). Further, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from the other members of the Inkisi complex, L. nzadimalawu and the intermediate/hybrid specimens by the presence of a cornified Varicorhinus real cutting edge on the outer edge of the lower jaw in combination with the absence of barbels and poorly developed fleshy lips on the lateral side of the lower jaw vs. never with a cutting edge but instead always with a free mental lobe in combination with two pairs of well-developed barbels and well-developed fleshy lips in L. nzadimalawu; although a cornified Varicorhinus real cutting edge can be found in some specimens, this most often in combination with at leats a single pair of well-developed barbels and well-developed fleshy lips in the hybrid specimens; in addition, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. nzadimalawu by its broad mouth width, 26.8-50.5% of head length vs. 16.1-26.5%, short head length, 20.1-22.1% of standard length vs. 23.0-26.4%, long dorsal-fin base length, 14.4-17.9% of standard length vs. 12.1-16.0%, and short prepectoral distance, 20.0-22.1% of standard length vs. 22.6-26.0% (Ref. 127934). Finally, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from Acapoeta tanganicae by its low number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 57-67 (Ref. 127934). Within the adjacent Lower Guinea ichthyofaunal province, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. axelrodi, L. batesii, L. brevispinis, L. cardozoi, L. caudovittatus, L. compiniei, L. habereri, L. fimbriatus, L. jaegeri, L. malacanthus, L. mariae, L. mbami, L. micronema, mungoensis, L. roylii, L. sandersi, L. semireticulatus, L. steindachneri, L. tornieri, L. versluysii and L. werneri by its higher number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. aspius, L. lucius and L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. lower jaw clearly prognathous; and from L. rocadasi by its last unbranched dorsal-fin ray not being transformed into a well-developed spine, but instead being clearly segmented over approximately half its length, or 43.0-50.1% of dorsal-fin height vs. last unbranched dorsal-fin ray transformed into a spine, clearly segmented only at its most distal end; finally, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from Sanagia velifera by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 22-24 (Ref. 127934). Within the adjacent Quanza ichthyofaunal province, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. ansorgii, L. gulielmi, L. jubbi, L. nanningsi, L. rhinophorus, L. rosae and L. roylii by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. clarkeae, L. ensifer and L. varicostoma by the absence of papillae on the anterior edge of the lower jaw vs. with well identifiable papillae; from L. lucius and L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. lower jaw clearly prognathous; and from L. boulengeri, L. ensis, L. girardi, L. steindachneri, L. stenostoma and L. rocadasi by its last unbranched dorsal-fin ray not being transformed into a well-developed spine, but instead being clearly segmented over approximately half its length, or 43.0-50.1% of dorsal-fin height vs. last unbranched dorsal-fin ray transformed into a spine, clearly segmented only at its most distal end (Ref. 127934).


Body shape (shape guide): elongated.

生物学特性     字汇 (例如 epibenthic)


生命周期和交配行为 成熟度 | 繁殖 | 产卵场 | | 孕卵数 | 仔鱼


主要参考文献 上传您的参考资料 | 参考文献 | 合作者 | 合作者

Vreven, E.J.W.M.N., T. Musschoot, E. Decru, S. Wamuini Lunkayilakio, K. Obiero, A.F. Cerwenka and U.K. Schliewen, 2018. The complex origins of mouth polymorphism in the Labeobarbus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) of the Inkisi River basin (Lower Congo, DRC, Africa): insights from an integrative approach. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 186:414-482. (Ref. 127934)

世界自然保护联盟红皮书 (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

对人类的威胁

 





人类利用

渔业: 没有兴趣
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

更多信息

营养生态学
食物(猎物)
食性组成
食物消耗量
口粮
捕食者
生态学
生态学
人口动态
成长参数
最大年龄/尺寸
长度-重量关系
长短关系
体长-频率
质量转换
入添量
丰度
生命周期
繁殖
成熟度
成熟度/腮部关系
孕卵数
产卵场
产卵群

卵的发育
仔鱼
稚鱼动力学
分布
领土
FAO区域
生态系
标本纪录
简介
BRUVS - 视频
解剖学
鳃区
大脑
耳石
生理学
身体成分
营养素
耗氧量
游泳类型
游泳速度
视觉色素
鱼声
疾病与寄生虫
毒性(半数致死浓度)
遗传学
基因组
遗传学
异质性
遗传率
基因多样性
与人类有关
水产养殖系统
水产养殖描述
品种
雪卡毒病例
邮票、硬币、杂项
外联
合作者
分类学
俗名
同种异名
型态特徵
形态测量图
照片
参考文献
参考文献

工具

特别资料

下载 XML

网络资源

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | 核实 FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: , | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | 树状分类阶层 | Wikipedia: 转至, 搜寻 | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | 动物学的记录

基于模型的估算

系统发育多样性指数 (参考文献 82804):  PD50 = 0.5000   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.00468 (0.00218 - 0.01003), b=3.10 (2.90 - 3.30), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
营养阶层 (参考文献 69278):  3.2   ±0.5 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
回复力 (参考文献 120179):  中等的, 族群倍增时间最少 1.4 - 4.4年 (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
渔业脆弱性 (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (15 of 100). 🛈